Home Industries Banking & Finance Lawsuit alleges Joy Global undervalued in sale

Lawsuit alleges Joy Global undervalued in sale

Seeks to block proxy, shareholder vote

Joy Global's Milwaukee production facility at 4400 W. National Ave.

The acquisition of Milwaukee-based Joy Global Inc. by Komatsu faces a legal challenge by a shareholder arguing the deal is “fundamentally unfair” to shareholders.

Joy Global
Joy Global’s Milwaukee production facility at 4400 W. National Ave.

Bayohle Oduntan, a Joy shareholder, filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin earlier this week. The suit names the company, several executives and board members and was filed as a class action.

In a Securities and Exchange Commission filing made earlier this month, Joy revealed Komatsu initially offered $17 per share for the company. Joy didn’t counter the offer, but Komatsu continued to increase the price until Joy suggested $28 per share, to which Komatsu agreed. The company’s share price increased over the first half of the year and Joy’s board sought to increase the price in the days before the deal was announced. Komatsu eventually agreed to $28.30 per share.

The filing also shows that Joy opted against reaching out to any other companies about a potential deal, believing Komatsu was the best partner and fearing a potential leak.

The suit alleges that the deal undervalues Joy Global, citing a BizTimes Milwaukee story in which analyst Robert W. Baird & Co. Mircea Dobre said $40 per share would be a better target. The suit also says Joy should have reached out to other companies about a potential sale and failed to disclose a potential conflict of interest between Joy, Komatsu and Goldman Sachs, which provided Joy with financial opinions on the deal.

Oduntan is seeking to block the company from providing a definitive proxy statement until additional information he requests is included. He is also asking a judge to block any shareholder vote until that information is included, along with awarding other damages.

Arthur covers banking and finance and the economy at BizTimes while also leading special projects as an associate editor. He also spent five years covering manufacturing at BizTimes. He previously was managing editor at The Waukesha Freeman. He is a graduate of Carroll University and did graduate coursework at Marquette. A native of southeastern Wisconsin, he is also a nationally certified gymnastics judge and enjoys golf on the weekends.
The acquisition of Milwaukee-based Joy Global Inc. by Komatsu faces a legal challenge by a shareholder arguing the deal is “fundamentally unfair” to shareholders. [caption id="attachment_124046" align="alignright" width="326"] Joy Global's Milwaukee production facility at 4400 W. National Ave.[/caption] Bayohle Oduntan, a Joy shareholder, filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin earlier this week. The suit names the company, several executives and board members and was filed as a class action. In a Securities and Exchange Commission filing made earlier this month, Joy revealed Komatsu initially offered $17 per share for the company. Joy didn’t counter the offer, but Komatsu continued to increase the price until Joy suggested $28 per share, to which Komatsu agreed. The company’s share price increased over the first half of the year and Joy’s board sought to increase the price in the days before the deal was announced. Komatsu eventually agreed to $28.30 per share. The filing also shows that Joy opted against reaching out to any other companies about a potential deal, believing Komatsu was the best partner and fearing a potential leak. The suit alleges that the deal undervalues Joy Global, citing a BizTimes Milwaukee story in which analyst Robert W. Baird & Co. Mircea Dobre said $40 per share would be a better target. The suit also says Joy should have reached out to other companies about a potential sale and failed to disclose a potential conflict of interest between Joy, Komatsu and Goldman Sachs, which provided Joy with financial opinions on the deal. Oduntan is seeking to block the company from providing a definitive proxy statement until additional information he requests is included. He is also asking a judge to block any shareholder vote until that information is included, along with awarding other damages.

Stay up-to-date with our free email newsletter

Keep up with the issues, companies and people that matter most to business in the Milwaukee metro area.

By subscribing you agree to our privacy policy.

No, thank you.
Exit mobile version